There have been a few significant events in the past few days in the
technology world. Apple released the iPod Video. Microsoft
signed a deal with Yahoo to have interoperability of their Instant
Messaging (IM) users and Google announced the Google Foundation.
With the Google Foundation, if the stock goes up, the Foundation gets
more. If the stock goes down, the Foundation gets less.
That's nice. Its probably generosity just like a Bay Street stock
trader would imagine it should be.
I am all for socially responsible companies but I do not agree with
this. First of all, it is not necessarily reasonable to expect
the shareholders of Google to commit profit to a philanthropic
arm. Strictly speaking, profit is supposed to be divested between
the owners of a company (its shareholders) and then those shareholders
can donate as they wish (or as I would prefer it to be taxed on their
personal profit and that money spent by the government of a liberal
democracy).
The Bill & Melinda Gates foundation has assets of over $25 billion
and is bankrolled by those two individuals. Brin and Page of
Google collectively have $11 billion. As they are both under 35,
I would estimate that they could live very comfortably (hey, go ahead
and buy the Larry Ellison style boat) on say, $1 billion each. So why not
just donate $9 billion and kick off that foundation in style. And
maybe they could join other Americans in championing a reversal in the
disturbing trend of a huge disparity between rich and poor.
Seriously Google. Eye on the prize. And Brin and Page (and
other excessively wealthy Americans), please stand up for social
democracy. Let's not look to corporations to save us.
|
|
||||||||||||
|
About
Recent Articles
Month Archive
Login
This Month
|
Generosity according to the stock market.
by
Siobhan McLaughlin
on Thu 13 Oct 2005 07:10 AM PDT | Permanent Link
Comments
Re: Generosity according to the stock market.
by
Ross
on Fri 14 Oct 2005 11:24 AM EDT | Profile | Permanent Link
Earlier this year, Google's market cap exceeded that of Indonesia.
That's right, all of Google's assets are worth more than one of the hottest economies in the South Pacific (I lifted this from yesterday's Post - too lazy to find a citation...) The implication is that the foundation will definitely get less. There's no way that Google can sustain their valuation - anyone that thinks that their assets (mind you, this includes their campus which gets you some great cafeteria) are worth more than an entire country is off their rocker. Which sort of implies that Google shareholders are in for a bumpy ride... Trackbacks
TrackBack URL: Weblogs that reference this article:
|
Blogs I'm reading these days
Now Reading
What I've Read
|
||||||||||