Our readers write:
Think of radio. Radio is required for music to become popular. A&R
reps buy out slots on major broadcast networks to get airplay for their
new singles and artists.
Its true that this is how this industry used to work. Send
off your focus track with your payola to radio station programmers in
key markets (Detroit Rock City!)
and wait til you get it in rotation. The T. worked at a radio station
and has stories of the stacks of focus tracks that landed on desks
there.
But have you talked to a teenager lately? What is their
favorite radio station? Seriously, I would like to know because I would
listen to it.
I spend time listening to radio and from what I can tell (by
advertising) in Toronto they are geared towards adults who drive or
work in offices (dentist, doctor) that play radio. Aside from the
Flow, there are no radio stations that have more than half of their
songs in rotation recorded in 2004 or 2005.
I think most teenagers these days get their music from these sources:
TV shows, Advertisements (played on TV, at the beginning of movies)
Movies, and their friends. And don't forget that they are
mining alot of music from the past (parents). Led Zeppelin and
AC/DC are new again! Kurt Cobain has a whole new batch of fans
every year someone turns 14. From what I hear the A/R business is
changing but I would guess (warning: theory without extensive research backing it up) that they talk to a lot more than the programmer at the Jack trying to get their song popular.
There is always a role for broadcast media. But I think its a
fragmenting industry and its changing. It used it to be about
infrastructure and now its becoming about content. Personally,
I'm excited by the changes and I'm interested in see what becomes of
it.
|
|
||||||||
|
About
Recent Articles
Month Archive
Login
This Month
|
Blame it on the VTR
by
Siobhan McLaughlin
on Fri 11 Nov 2005 07:40 AM PST | Permanent Link
Comments
Re: Blame it on the VTR
by
Calum Tsang
on Fri 11 Nov 2005 04:47 PM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
Its true that this is how this industry used to work. It still does work this way: http://www.newyorker.com/talk/content/?040712ta_talk_surowiecki I think most teenagers these days get their music from these sources: TV shows, Advertisements (played on TV, at the beginning of movies) Movies, and their friends. You missed the 800 pound gorilla in the room, MuchMusic, and it's derivatives. That's still broadcast media. TV shows and ads both use traditional channels. Sure, the kids on the OC may be listening to the new Avril Lavigne tune, and that might be novel "youth marketing", but that's still using your regular ways of moving product. What it's not is some sort of internet driven, Synergistic Convergence. But why does it have to be teenagers? If your comment is correct that most Toronto area radio stations are AOR only, you can't discount the need for broadcast media to make music palatable for soccer moms and dentists to buy. Calum Re: Blame it on the VTR
by
Siobhan McLaughlin
on Sat 12 Nov 2005 04:09 PM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
Its true that payola is still used in this way. And Dirty Vegas got a hit by getting their song placed in a car ad.
I agree that broadcast media is still required, again I think what is changing is the infrastructure and method of delivery. Also, Synergistic Convergence is a joke, yeah? Re: Blame it on the VTR
by
onezan
on Mon 14 Nov 2005 09:30 AM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
does anyone have stats on who is buying music? is it the soccer moms or the teenagers?
Re: Blame it on the VTR
by
Siobhan McLaughlin
on Mon 14 Nov 2005 09:56 AM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
I used my nieces and nephews as examples. They are pretty typical with varying levels of interest in music.
What I find is common in all of them is that they listen to a lot of music that is of the past (parents music) and none of them listen to a radio station in the way that I remember (ghetto blaster, mix tape at the ready to record my fav new song complete with unavoidable DJ voice over). But I will do some research and post. Re: Blame it on the VTR
by
Calum Tsang
on Mon 14 Nov 2005 10:42 AM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
n=2 research is kinda spotty.
Re: Blame it on the VTR
by
Siobhan McLaughlin
on Mon 14 Nov 2005 10:47 AM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
n=2?
sio. Re: Blame it on the VTR
by
Calum Tsang
on Mon 14 Nov 2005 04:50 PM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
Your sample size in this analysis is 2 people (your niece and nephew).
If your people just happen to be kids weaned by hippie parents who like folk or wannabe rap gangstas, you can derive all sorts of incorrect insight from it :) Re: Blame it on the VTR
by
Siobhan McLaughlin
on Mon 14 Nov 2005 04:57 PM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
Oh. Well actually n>2. But anyway. I meant I would do more broader research in that last comment.
The one thing I know for certain is that the way they find new music is a lot different than I did. Trackbacks
TrackBack URL: |
Blogs I'm reading these days
Now Reading
What I've Read
|
||||||